It's so easy there are no actual working recycling facilities for lithium ion facilities. Multiple projects to do so, including two only in Sweden, but nothing in operation.
So maybe it's not economically viable?
See for example Redwood Materials:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-04-18/redwood-m...
Given the expense of shipping materials long distances, it's quite likely that recycling will be far cheaper than processing from freshly obtained materials. But it remains to be seen what innovations will happen in the mining space or in the recycling space to change that balance.
For something like a big battery station, you can easily ensure the optimal battery conditions for long life.
And then there's using alternate chemistries as mentioned.
But to summarize: this is not an issue. Not even a little bit. There are no nasty surprises involving batteries suddenly not working because they flaked out after a few months/years/whatever in the grid storage industry. This simply doesn't happen. Sure, individual battery cells might fail and then they get replaced or disabled. But there is zero indication that that is in anyway a frequent thing or a big deal in the industry. Mostly all we have is success stories. New batteries get deployed. News flash! They work exactly as advertised and operators save some money.
This is of course not surprising. Batteries used for grid storage are built to certain specifications. And that includes specifying how long they are expected to last (measured in charge cycles typically). So, all that is factored into the cost of the setup. Mostly all indications are that grid batteries are 1) very reliable and predictable 2) work exactly as advertised 3) might reasonably be expected to continue working quite long beyond their rated life time.