There will be a time in not-so-distant future when people look back at this kind of policy as silly.
this is fundamentally different. this is a machine, a mathematical equation, that converts enormous amounts of history and facts into a facsimile of creation, thought, expression. it does it convincingly in very small doses, but it doesn't do it all that well. unless your task is to regurgitate something relatively mechanical.
a car was something new. a mechanical horse. it wasn't some distillation and averaging of every extant horse into some "perfect" mutant horse. it was genuinely new. it also wasn't a mirage or a hallucination.
AI is not a creative force, rather reductive. it's at best a tool. so if you want to copyright something or you want to contribute to NetBSD, sure, that's fine. but copy-paste of someone else? no matter what the underlying process, it's still wrong.
it's not Luddite behavior for saying "no, we don't want to do that"
Also HN: AI is evil because it's stealing copyrighted works!
also me: AI is evil because it tricks people into giving up their creativity, which isn't the boring part, it's the real part
also also me: wtf? why bring that up?
The factory owners said, "lol, nah" and fired them all to hire cheaper labor to run the autolooms so they could keep the increase in profitability to themselves.
The Luddites were rightfully pissed and wrecked shit. The factory owners, had they been less greedy, could have kept the Luddites on board.
With the amount of people getting killed by careless drivers, we should bring those back, at least in cities.
Only if copyright laws are abolished, or stop being enforced completely.
[0] https://urbanaccessregulations.eu/countries-mainmenu-147/swi...