Scholars discover rare 16th-century tome with handwritten notes by John Milton
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
Some years ago I did some volunteer work where I had to go through some thousands of old books at a library and find the valuable ones. I came to the conclusion that around 1850 there was a "phase change" in printing. You could tell the books before 1850, they were works of love. After 1850, I think mass printing took off, or something, but you can feel books were not luxury items anymore.
In any case, this gentleman here has in his possession a book before 1600, and he writes on its margins. Maybe this was a form of conspicuous consumption. But just look how gorgeous that book was. And the guy just scribbled some stuff on it.
My understanding is that writing notes in the margin has always been a very normal thing to do going back to the middle ages.
Most of the books that survive from that era are family bibles because they were the books treasured and passed down by families, rather than thrown away after reading. The book in TFA was in essence a historical reference so it makes sense he would add notes. These were literally the only places where that kind of knowledge would be stored
This is the second paragraph from the article:
> Add one more title to that small list, as scholars recently discovered a copy of Holinshed's Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland in the Phoenix Public Library, containing handwritten notes in Milton's distinctive hand. This makes the volume extra-special, since only two other books once owned by Milton also contain handwritten notes. The scholars detailed their findings in a new article published in the Times Literary Supplement.
16th century, yet only "recently discovered".
I guess it depends on what you think of as "mass printing", but estimates have it that in the 16th century Venice alone produced around 25,000 editions of books. You can also find references to Italy producing relatively mass amounts of paper by that time, distributed to western Europe and Constantinople through Venice. You really didn't need to be "enormously wealthy" to buy a paper book at the time. Wealthy, to some extent? Yes, moreso revealed by the fact that you were literate, but not crazy wealthy.
Also, in general, people simply often had a different relationship to books than we do today. They were not regarded as priceless objects, or as things ruined by marginalia. Writing marginalia was seen as a fundamental part of reading and owning a book, part of how one understands a book and makes it theirs. Having a personal library was as much about having the books on hand as well as having your margin notes.
The latter half of the 1800s saw the commoditization of consumer goods as industrial manufacturing processes replaced craftsmen. I became aware of this dynamic when I started collecting textiles. The arts and crafts movement in the latter 1800s was founded in direct response to (what they perceived to be) the soulless products produced at scale in factories.
I guess yogh was obsoleted long before this text though as there as several of "gh" and "ch" clusters e.g. "chastise", "chased" and "fought".
Illumine, what is low raise and support;
That to the highth of this great Argument
I may assert th’ Eternal Providence,
And justifie the wayes of God to men.
Perhaps it's more a normal distribution, at the beginning with a light buzz the ways of God seem to be more OK, at its height in the middle everything God ever did is GREAT, and then the fall and the eventual conclusion that everything is unjust and then vomiting.
That just means they were dissatisfied with life before drinking. Just were holding it inside.
Whether those drinking realise this is another matter.
I suspect there are more people who have tried alcohol and no longer drink than have read Milton. Perhaps we need some data on that!
Which is good. All roads start with a single step and to make this step you have to realize where are you now. And expressing this dissatisfaction verbally can be a very goods first step as long as you are not just drinking it away.
Not trying to say that this is as good as therapy or something and alcohol my lead to some bad results but still.
The Ses look about as normal as could be to me. What's distinctive about them?
If anything, I'm surprised John Milton's handwriting looks so similar to modern handwriting.
A couple of characters can be tricky at first because they look different to late modern latin script, like the s that has two forms in this font. It's actually very easy to read for being an old book.
"Great troubles he had in both but little he did PSEUAILE in the latter, before he had over come the FIRA and therefore minding to CHADILE the rebels..."
FIRA - First
CHADILE - Chastise
> The sword and the law he made to be the foundation of his governement,
> in the bogs he pursued them, in the thickets he followed them,
> This duke before his voiage, calling at Fiscam (?) all his nobilitie unto him, caused them to sweare fealtie unto his yoong sonne William, whome he then at his journie betooke unto the governance of earle Gilbert, and the defense of the governour unto Henrie the French king.
Why do we think it's more plausible that the words are being spelled "dw", "fwrth", "ywng", and "betwke" than "doo", "foorth", "yoong", and "betooke"? "Took" is still spelled that way today, and "poor" uses the same vowel as "forth".
Whereas to the best of my knowledge, W can only appear as a vowel in Welsh.