Is the Internet going down? Undersea sub-cables have just broken...
timesonline.typepad.com
timesonline.typepad.com
It's still funny.
I find it is always worth a peek at this http://www.internettrafficreport.com/main.htm
before getting too doom-laden.
+++ATH0
I think people will see doom and gloom wherever they want to see it.
So no. Give it a rest with the doom and gloom already.
Are there really only 4 cables that carry all the traffic? I would expect some sort of redundancy.
Keep in mind that these cables are very, very expensive.
We talk about redundancy all the time. Many of us are experts in redundancy from the software level all the way up to the infrastructure level.
It's seriously hard to believe this type of thing can occur, on accident or otherwise.
Did that word ever hold any meaning at all?
(from http://www.francetelecom.com/en_EN/press/press_releases/cp08... )
A first appraisal at 7:44 am UTC gave an estimate of the following impact on the voice traffic (in percentage of out of service capacity):
- Djibouti: 71% out of service
- Egypt: 52% out of service
- United Arab Emirates: 68% out of service
- India: 82% out of service
- Lebanon: 16% out of service
- Malaysia: 42% out of service
- Maldives: 100% out of service
- Pakistan: 51% out of service
- Qatar: 73% out of service
- Saudi Arabia: 55% out of service
- Syria: 36% out of service
- Taiwan: 39% out of service
- Yemen: 38% out of service
- Zambia: 62% out of serviceNet speeds are back to normal now, though response times are still a bit off.
The second time in less than a year sounds suspicious, but the time you are thinking of was in late January. Is it really any more suspicious to happen again 11 months later rather than 12? It's only a cognitive bias that makes "one year" sound like a much longer time than "11 months". Also consider that this would be the same season and thus similar weather conditions and fishing seasons, and that the accepted conclusion about January's event was that particularly bad weather conditions at the time caused a large number of ships in the Mediterranean to drop anchor, the dragging of which is a common cause of cable cuts.
That it is multiple backbones and they broke simultaneously sounds suspicious, but these cables are all located quite close together, close enough that it's possible they could be severed by the same event. No coordination or intent is necessary.
That it is the Middle East sounds suspicious, but who is the suspect, and what is the motive? The fact is that this is more of an inconvenience than real harm to anybody, and doesn't appear to benefit anybody, either. If it was a US action, why does it primarily inconvenience US allies and economic partners? If it was a terrorist act, why has nobody taken responsibility for it?
I see no reason why these cables would be any different, though as noted in the same article, the fact that there are far fewer means that each cut is more significant (and thus newsworthy). The rest of the article is fairly grounding, too.
One of my all-time favorites, though, is this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tcp_synflood.png