Worse still, the concentration of wealth has enabled large private equity firms to gobble up what were once thriving small businesses across various industries - from veterinary clinics to engineering firms. This trend stifles entrepreneurship and limits opportunities for employees to rise through the ranks and become owners themselves.
America has lost half its public companies since the 1990s. The count of publicly listed companies traded on US exchanges has fallen substantially from its peak in 1996. Back then, the number exceeded 8,000 companies. Today that count has dropped by more than 50% to just 3700 [1].
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/09/investing/premarket-stocks-tr...
The demand for ever-increasing a growth demanded by the markets is not sustainable for a majority of businesses. IMO the employees, customers, and general public would benefit from companies growing to a healthy size and then maintaining that plateau.
SquareSpace has ~44% of the self-hosted website market. Shouldn't that be enough?
They’re making hundreds of thousands of dollars of profit on hundreds of millions of dollars of gross profit [1]. Most of the cost is marketing & sales. Private equity is actually about focussing less on growth and more on sustainability; the logic of this acquisition is that 44% is enough.
[1] https://d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net/CIK-0001496963/d08174f...
Sure? Most people are motivated by compensation.
There is no reason that random mom and pop shops shouldnt be able to list their sandwitch shop and raise 50k to remodel. Will there be tons of scams and nonsense? Yes. Dont invest in tiny companies with no track record then, easy solution. Will productive stuff also happen? Also yes. People can already waste their money gambling/smoking/lotteries/drugs/stock options/supid luxury goods - all of which have a guaranteed chance of working out poorly for society, but this is apparently ok and we instead need to protect people from the stock market.
Refs: 0: https://www.plunderthebook.com/
Here's an article from last year, but if you search "IPO drought" in a news search engine you can find a lot of more recent articles https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2023/02/0...
The lack of IPOs is not from market demand, it is just easier to be private. If there are venture firms willing to invest or the debt market is accessible, then there is no need to for a company to go public.
Generally speaking, private equity sales are not more attractive than IPOs.
as the current rate hike cycle started, PEs were less willing to transact at higher rates, companies were less likely to transact at lower multiples and M&A markets cooled off
I'm not out of the industry, but from the outside, it seems like most parties are in a holding pattern waiting for the soft/hard-landing that is yet to come. I suspect sellers are still holding their breaths for valuations to go back to where they were
I know of at least two companies in the billion+ range that could have sold at 20%+ premium to their current valuations but walked away thinking those offers were too low, only to see markets melt in the 6-12 months that followed...