Bill proposes for all Chinese high schoolers to receive military training
asia.nikkei.com
asia.nikkei.com
Not exactly what I would call "pretty stable"
It's well under a lifetime, and is around the number of years people in the US expect to work before retirement.
Taking just the GDR for example, statistically anyone who was born around the years of its founding went on to outlive that government by another 20-25 years.
You can't really call a government stable if basically everyone born into it is expected to outlive it.
https://database.earth/population/germany/life-expectancy#:~....
And independently of the question of whether or not 40 years is a "long time", the fact also remains that Warsaw Pact Germany, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia had large scale uprisings in the 1950s and 1960s which were violently put down by the Soviet military.
Ergo, the East Bloc was not a stable system.
They used to have hotwars with Vietnam, skirmishes with Russia and India. They’d send brigades to the countryside to engage in community driven building of whatever, backyard smelters, canal digging, earthworks, etc. they’d let up a few decades, but people are getting too bourgeois for their own good and need some taste of country proletariat.
Aside from actually going to war, there can be many benefits for a government like China.
[1] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E9%AB%98%E7...
[2] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%99%AE%E9%80%9A%E9%AB%98%E7...
[3] https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%BB%8D%E8%A8%93_(%E4%B8%AD%...
I don’t really know if I’ve heard of that happening anywhere else.
Not surprising at all, seeing as I have never heard a satisfying distinction between fascism and communism. What ends up being described is blanket totalitarianism, every time.
There’s a qualitative difference between “be proud of your country” and “we will now prepare to vanquish the enemies of the motherland”