Corn fields occupy how much of each state?
substackcdn.com
substackcdn.com
I took it up on myself to see exactly how much space Corn Fields occupy in each state, and the results are quite interesting.
Here are the top 3 Corn states by surface area occupied by Corn
1. Iowa 36.4% 2. Illinois 29.7% 3. Indiana 23.6%
The US also is one of the top producers of Soybeans, Wheat, and Cotton, which also occupy much of the Midwest and Plains, but not as much as corn does. To see those maps, please see this blog post! :)
The same piece of land may get planted twice in a year, which would mean it is reported twice in those stats.
In warm-winter states it may be more easily done, but even in cold-winter states you have this kind of thing: https://www.agriculture.com/crops/wheat/how-winter-wheat-can...
For those looking for concrete data:
Iowa: 13.1M acres
Illinois: 11.2M acres
Nebraska: 9.95M acres
Minnesota: 8.6M acres
Indiana: 5.45M acres
Ohio: 4.75M acres
Source (switch state name at end of url for others): https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverv...
Oh, yeah? I dare you!
Even here in Iowa, there are plenty of soybean fields among the cornfields. Not to mention the groves near old farmhouses and numerous creeks and rivers also lined with trees.
It would be an interesting challenge to see how far someone could drive surrounded only by cornfields. I'll even allow corn-free travel inside city limits.
Or maybe there is a map/list of each zone by state (e.g. commercial, industrial, government, residential, farm, etc.).
Yes, they grew corn, quash, and beans. They were also semi-nomadic and hunted. Until they were placed on reservations in Kansas and Nebraska, where they started raising livestock.
They weren't really notable for growing corn.
We got to the Welcome Center. It was abandoned. Windows were broken. The parking lot was in disrepair. It was completely encapsulated in corn. It looked like a great place for a young couple to get murdered by a serial killer in a corn field. There was absolutely no wifi. I've never left a Welcome Center in such a hurry.
> The research, which was funded in part by the National Wildlife Federation and U.S. Department of Energy, found that ethanol is likely at least 24% more carbon-intensive than gasoline due to emissions resulting from land use changes to grow corn, along with processing and combustion.
This is how you get people skeptics of net zero
There is no point in splitting hair - if you find yourself even having a debate about which is worse, it is already a failure.