It seems this "new strategy" is basically the brute-force approach.
Maybe a decade or two ago I would've been more optimistic, but it's very much in their economic interests to not have long-lasting immunity.
It seems this "new strategy" is basically the brute-force approach.
Maybe a decade or two ago I would've been more optimistic, but it's very much in their economic interests to not have long-lasting immunity.
Whose interests? This is publicly funded (NIH) research from a lab at Duke, which is a university with a massive nonprofit medical center. Government is paying the cost of R&D and it is in the financial interests of the US government to fund development and testing of a long lasting vaccine. Think of the savings to Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA.
You know the government pretty much subsidizes vaccines because the risk/reward profile doesn't really work for companies.
Meanwhile there is no meaningful treatment for influenza, so there is no money to be made by not making a vaccine for it.