It sounds like there's no good review process for these; if they lack substance or are too long, they should never be published. But I take it that the people responsible for the people writing these also get the benefits?
Am I going to be a difficult person here finding each and single flaw about the doc or should I just allow it, let the other person get more visibility and just move on with my work. Why should I be a bottleneck here for a pointless battle.