Indeed, if anything it's Microsoft who should be scrutinized.
Indeed, if anything it's Microsoft who should be scrutinized.
Not on you though, this kind of reasoning failure is so common I think it deserves a fancy "cognitive bias" name. Off the cuff maybe something like "Single Rebuttal Fallacy"?
I never understood this: Why would hot shot, high powered people risk putting such things on email? Things that could backfire when released into public domain like from a lawsuit or a leak. They know this well, and still keep doing it. Why not setup an in person meeting, or just pickup the phone and talk ? Why email?
I almost feel they actually want it to happen but could never point my finger to how this could cover their asses, or an exit strategy?
Everything has a legal liability, it doesn't mean that it's worth it to move everything to an undocumented medium.
How did the FTC get microsoft's email over an antitrust lawsuit against google