The Bloody History of 'Deadline'
merriam-webster.com
merriam-webster.com
>Gutapercha ring making is all the go now by the men and some of them are making really beautiful ones.
So wikipediaed gutapercha, which turns out to be a tree. The same name is used for a latex made from the tree. This material made undersea cables possible in the early days.
But I was curious: why rings? Well, it might have something to do with the caning of Charles Sumner in 1856. Brooks, a pro-slavery U.S. representative beat Sumner, an abolitionist representative, nearly to death on the Senate floor with a gutapercha cane. Brooks' colleagues then wore necklaces with rings made from the shattered cane. So that letter might've come from a Confederate soldier.
https://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/entries/heartsill-willia...
The mention of Mr. Lynch a line or so earlier was another threat of violence on the prisoners. "Lynch" was still relatively new at the time, too:
Seems like gutta-percha rings became a confederate symbol. https://esploro.libs.uga.edu/esploro/outputs/994936595870295... https://books.google.com/books?id=PUZyui6tt98C&dq=Gutta-perc...
Edit: according to wiktionary, in the 20th century it was used in the printing industry for a line on the bed of a press beyond which text wouldn't print, then by analogy as a time limit after which a newspaper story wouldn't make it into the paper. It's not clear if this sense was inspired by the Civil War prison dead lines, or made up independently.
I suppose this could serve as the unspoken signature line in most communiques. Thanks MW
There’s a hint that it started to become used metaphorically toward the end of the 19th century, but without any examples of early usage or even speculation as to how a spatial metaphor became a chronological metaphor, the origins of the modern usage remain a mystery.
When someone comes with one, the first question should be "who's dead after that line ?". If no one actually dies, it's not a deadline, just a target release date.
"someone will die" is hard to act on, "XXXX amount spent on this XMas campaign will be lost and our partner X will go under" is a lot more valuable information, and potentially helps to adjust priorities too make X whole if other parts need to be sacrificed.
This was written by an imprisoned soldier. Who thinks that a depressing number of college students today would be incapable of this writing quality?
Some future civilization may read our writings today and similarly marvel at its archaic style.
I heavily doubt one would read an old instruction manual or an employee handbook with overflowing glee just because it used an archaic style, at best maybe briefly consider the novelty of a few out-of-use words before moving on.