It's an unfortunate limitation for a device I own to be handicapped this way.
It's an unfortunate limitation for a device I own to be handicapped this way.
It's not a real security check that they're doing, but rather just checking for certification, which is very unfortunate.
Android Auto is completely disabled as an opinionated security measure.
Google Pay and some banking apps (ones that require Google's Play Integrity API) will not run. GrapheneOS doesn't attempt to spoof these APIs because they are moving towards cryptographic verification [0]. Most apps don't require this check but if they do you are out of luck unless you can get the app developers to trust GrapheneOS's keys.
[0]: https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-gu...
Nowadays it's the Google's Find My Tag network which will be unsupported.
https://grapheneos.org/usage#android-auto
VoLTE and VoWiFi are supported if your carrier supports it.
Google Maps and Uber work fine, provided you install sandboxed Google Play.
banks and gov sites say it's because of security, but accept SMS. so we know what it's really about
I still hate it, but can't do much about it.
Custom ROMs nowadays require you to be scouring Qualcomm out of tree source repositories (or firmware dumps of equivalent phones, I think, in the case of Mediatek). It's impossible to guarantee quality with this conditions. Even if you just want to have a pristine kernel tree of the original firmware you may find, if it was ever released, it was squashed on the wrong source commit (again, laurel_sprout, though a random Github angel fixed it).
So Google's devices tend, thankfully, to have better sources. Additionally, GOS team is competent and, for now, sustained full-time by donations. Those three conditions are what allow GOS to be a very good ROM.
Do note: it has its quirks, specially with the new trimestral code dumps by Google where half-baked features are on the source (though disabled by feature flags).
nary the case but i suppose if i absolutely needed to access any finances from my mobile device, it certainly wouldn't be from one of said institution's own mobile apps, but via web browser.
I used to do home banking from my bank's website. Recently, they created a digital-only branch for customers who mostly do home banking and only rarely need to go in person to the bank. They asked their customers if they wanted to switch and offered services at the same or lower cost than before. I made the switch, but found out that unfortunately the new website lacks some functionalities that are only available from the mobile app. I guess they are assuming that most people would just use their phone anyway and didn't bother to reach feature parity between the website and the app, preferring the app.
i hope you switched back, lol.
You can also contact your bank and tell them that you want to be able to deposit checks via the Web site.
If enough people do this, and don't use the overly-proprietary app, the bank might listen.
There are workarounds, but it sounds annoying and a burden. What if the closest bank branch is an hour on foot away? Or the OP lives in a rural place and it's half an hour drive? I don't have this problem since my bank works with graphene, but I would reconsider using it if most applications I use refused to load.
who uses checks anymore, btw?
business organizations. the rest of your points are well said.