OpenAI slapped with GDPR complaint: How do you correct your work?
theregister.com
theregister.com
I'mmmmm not entirely sure that this is The Right Way™. Initially this sounds right but then after some thinking one can see dozens of cases where this paradigm fails.
> I'mmmmm not entirely sure that this is The Right Way™. Initially this sounds right but then after some thinking one can see dozens of cases where this paradigm fails.
Exactly! If we develop a reliable self-driving car technology that just happens to murder 1 out of every 1 million riders, the benefits of the technology are so great and transformative that it would be a disaster to hew too closely to our current legal hangups on murder.
Legal requirements are usually exist to prevent some kind of problem or abuse. Magic technology doesn't suddenly make those problems something that should be tolerated. If you want to change them, you'd better have a better reason than "I really like this tech" or "I want to make money without complying."
> Article 5(1)(d) GDPR imposes on the controller an obligation to erase or rectify without delay inaccurate data.
Article 5(1)(d) actually says personal data shall be:
> accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; every reasonable step must be taken to ensure that personal data that are inaccurate, having regard to the purposes for which they are processed, are erased or rectified without delay (‘accuracy’);
It's up to the court to determine whether "every reasonable step" has been taken.