Meanwhile, those stories about martians are all metaphors. But people can't distinguish the symbol from the symbolized.
Meanwhile, those stories about martians are all metaphors. But people can't distinguish the symbol from the symbolized.
You argue from the position that Martians 'must not be real'.
Why is your conclusion any better than those who argue that Martians could be real?
Science works upon evidence. If so:
a) there is some evidence to support the existence of prior life on Mars;
b) it is not the scientific case that life on Mars is impossible/implausible
So why do you so strongly hold on to your own dogma, and chastise the conclusions of others as mere 'fantasy' and 'sci-fi'? You are no smarter than everyone else, by merely being contrarian.
I cite how science permits plausibility upon evidence. This is in contrast to OP's wishful dogma, where anything not presently known must be fantasy/sci-based and implausible - which is not how science works.
Then again, I get it. If somebody offered to build me a Gundam I wouldn't think "Oh no, a symbol for the dehumanization of soldiers on the modern battlefield" I'd think "Is the beam saber included?"
The weather radar app replicates a feature of the Star Trek tricorder that I saw in an episode of TNG.
Household robots like in The Jetsons are coming soon, a couple decades at most from today.
Etc…
Wow, you're doing some heavy caveating with that comment.
Sure, someone today can say that a handheld device to show you the weather in any part of the world seems like a "duh" thing now, but in the 60s when Star Trek came to TV with a tricoder or really a handheld anything was pushing credibility. Computers at the time took up rooms in buildings. Of course zillenials never knowing the world before handheld mobile devices can't imagine a time when it took imagination to think of the things they have today.
And how did people come up with things before the sci fi was available like it is now.
I just really think influence of sci fi is really overestimated here.
In fact people bruteforcing ideas for sci fi before the tech was available proves that you can think of those ideas even if you don't have the tech available. And if you do, it is much easier to come up with all of it. The tech came naturally in order as different types of tech became available irrespective of sci fi.
What's your point?
No, I'm pretty sure a lot of people have came up with the ideas that I have, and irrespective of whether they watched sci-fi or not, as I did not.
I'm not even saying I'm smart or anything. I'm just saying people are capable of coming up with ideas without having anything to do with sci fi.
Life effectively began on Earth around 400 million years after it formed, and that's about the time that Mars' core cooled off and atmosphere got blown away. It seems that there was just enough time for life to start on Mars before it got snuffed out by the planetary geology of Mars and loss of its magnetosphere. If we ever find life on Mars, it's most certainly likely to be single-celled organisms.
Mars is the 2nd most habitable planet in the solar system and people have wondered if there was life out there for a lot longer than scifi has existed.
This article has plenty of such examples. First one I see it Democritus around 400 bc. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrial_life