Hacker News Reader

If they didn't already have dice in their hand, I would certainly expect the former.

They should turn around and ask me instead for a random number between 1 and 6 and then reply with seven minus that number.

How is that more random?

I was being somewhat tongue in cheek (absurdist?), but I suppose if you don't know my algorithm (7 - n) then it does add layer of ... uncertainty?

Depending on who you ask, the answer would have been "oh, I have an app for that. Hold on..."

GPT wins for not having that delay.

What a time to be alive

It is 4. It's always 4.