huh, sounds like WSL...
> WSL runs Linux programs under a different kernel by replicating the syscall interface
Only WSLv1 did this. WSL 2 is very boring architecturally, it just runs a full Linux machine in a HyperV VM domain.
Yes, DOS was basically a boot loader and utilities. The EFI shell is modeled the same way, though DOS had fewer address bits available. Netware also used it in this fashion, as a boot loader that may/not initialize hardware.
From memory, the next stage of the OS would simply write itself over DOS in memory, move the instruction pointer and go.
With LOADLIN, the Linux kernel completely replaced MS-DOS in memory. To get back to DOS, you had to reboot. Since MS-DOS was a single-task operating system (that is, you weren't normally running anything else at the same time, other than perhaps a few utility TSRs), and it booted quickly (other than the slow memory counting in the BIOS if you had that enabled), that was not a big deal.