Starbucks shares sink 8% as same-store sales fall, quarterly results miss
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
>McDonald’s, PepsiCo and other companies have said this quarter that low-income consumers have pulled back their spending and are looking for deals.
McDonald's prices have doubled in a decade.[1] Across the board, companies are posting profits well beyond what inflation can account for. How much has Starbucks raised it's prices out of pure greed?
On balance the price has gone up - inflation is real - but this kind of analysis is just wrong.
At some point, it is a more economical option to just make coffee and pastry's at home.
There is no economy of scale under this inflationary environment that would benefit from continued purchases.
As for pastries, toast on homemade bread has no competition.
Quality and taste was much better back then.
Now everything is made at scale with industrial ingredients, frozen, and mass distributed.
Of course it was. I make much better coffee at home than I could get at Starbucks. For me it's about something else: hanging out with friends or working on my laptop in an environment that's more interesting that my room or office. This is what I pay $10 of $11 for. (But admittedly, this happens rarely these days.)
I used to sometimes work at a Starbucks and buy sweets to bring home, since I don't drink coffee. I don't buy sweet treats since discovering they're actually frozen/thawed.
Hey, as long as you cook it before they hatch, what's the harm ;)
But why, though? Are they less delicious? Less convenient? Obviously not. Do you think the freezing/thawing process destroys the nutrition? Seems unlikely, since they aren't exactly a health food to begin with.
It was a dubious value at $5 or whatever per slice when I thought it was at least fresh. Knowing it was not remotely fresh, it was a clear loser in my book.
Profit makes way for survival.
People stood at table near windows. Then they removed tables.
Now people stand with their device in one hand and coffee in another.
When did urban retailers forget that customers in glass windows attract more customers?
https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-195.htm
Steve Gibson: Well, man about Starbucks.
Leo: Man about Starbucks. Yeah, that's a good...
Steve: I don't really get out on the town. I'm pretty much at Starbucks. In fact, today I was only there for five hours this morning. As I was walking out at 10:00, Jackie, who opened the store at 5:00, and I helped unlock the front door because I'm always there at opening, she said, "You're leaving early."
Leo: So wait a minute. Let me get this straight. You go there at 5:00 a.m.?
Steve: Yeah, every morning I'm there at opening at 5:00 a.m.
Leo: And that's breakfast for you.
Steve: Well, it gets me up and going. And my new deal now I'm so excited about is I've got my Northgate OmniKey 102 keyboard that I have under my other arm. And I've been spending 10 to 11 hours a day there.
Leo: What? Oh, so you're programming there instead of at home.
Steve: Yeah, yeah. In fact..."
https://www.tastingtable.com/1456219/starbucks-uncomfortable...
That said, if it gets the media to finally admit that an economy where 20% of Americans are at or facing imminent poverty concerns isn't "booming" I guess I'll take it. ALICE (Asset Light, Income Constrained, but Employed) is the norm, and we're being otherwise gaslit into thinking the economy is "too hot."
> To help drive innovation, Starbucks has turned to the team of R&D experts and baristas working side-by-side in Starbucks Tryer Center, to help streamline the work behind the counter, and enable more time for genuine human connection.
I wonder what metrics l they will come up with for "genuine human connection".
There's a price point that makes it not worth going to and at some point the profit from price increases will not compensate for the loss of customers.
Just my speculation but what 20 years was considered a „specialty coffee” now has nothing on the actual barista-run specialty places. And people learned how their coffee can actually taste like.
Not to mention the effect advocates like James Hoffmann must have had on people’s general awareness.
Also, poor people absolutely eat there. All those poor people working there get free food and employee discounts, others use the app, or they eat there once in a while as an alternative to more expensive restaurants.
Maybe I get that impression a little less in the UK, but that's only because their food isn't bad enough for British people to like it when they could be eating smack barm pey wet.
Also, by somewhat premium I mean in the same category as Starbucks, not a sit down restaurant.
That kind of worked back when the competition was Folger’s annealing to the pot at the local diner, but chains like Dunkin’ expanded and McDonald’s et al. upgraded and they all have better tasting coffee you don’t need to sweeten so much to cover the bitterness.
The staff told me that this reduced waste of all the drip they’d through out at the end of each shift/day.
Comically though, the coffee the machine put out was so hot that they were double cupping every order. The lids didn’t fit as snug over a double cup, so nearly every one of my orders dribbled down the cup as I walked out. And of course I went from “wait right here I’ll have your order right up” to waiting 2+ minutes for my cup to be made.
I’m not judging if it makes sense for Starbucks or not — maybe someone did all this math already. It was just a funny example of the ripple effects that stem from a seemingly easy decision to reduce waste, make each cup fresh, which would seem like no brainers.
Is that a commercial version of office "pod" machines?
If you have the skill, connections, supplies (because maybe you started a boutique coffee shop in the past), find ways to seize customers from Starbucks - by advertising LOWER prices. Starbucks cannot compete on prices but an upstart can.
I bought one of them coffee pod machines and just started buying keurig pods instead. For the price of roughly 2.25 lattes, I can get 10 pods that last me an entire week. It’s easier, cheaper, cleaner, and quicker than going to Starbucks or where ever else. I still miss the very act of going to get coffee, but that’s not enough to justify the cost when I could spend the money on gas for instance.
People only need so many coffees. Be happy with that. No need to sink shares and spoil it for everyone.
I think it's more like "people only need so many coffee shops." Now that they've mostly achieved saturation, they want to improve revenue by other means, like increasing prices, and people will only pay so much for their coffee and snacks (although the cutoff seems surprisingly high).
I want something with organic milk and ideally organic beans
I want better quality pastry
But I didn’t expect to see further decline quarter after quarter.