He would probably still agree with everything, but taken the money. He was at the top correct, a founder, and thus in his article, he would have taken the majority of the money.

It is possible to know something is wrong, and feel guilt, but still take the money and continue to voice these ideas about change.

It is hard to change a system when you are winning it. That doesn't mean he isn't also right that a lot of people are victims of it.

""In other words, they generate profit because they pay their employees less than they’re worth. If everyone could trade their labor for exactly the amount of money it was worth, the corporations that employ them would have a much harder time making money. Instead, in modern corporations the shareholders and the executive team - again, the central planning committee we so despise - make the majority of the money, while the front line does all the work and makes very little.""