List of people offering their time for free to have a "coffee chat"
github.com
github.com
CEO at GitHub?
On the other hand, if he did realize that this innocuous looking json update would render as CEO of GitHub, I'm not sure I hate it. I think people offering their time to chat with others is great, but I'm not a fan of this type of aggregation. If this makes it look sillier, maybe that's ok?
How it renders may need to be rethought...
I love that folks are doing this.
e.g. a university student (2025 grad) who is working part time is in this list.
There could very well be someone out there that’s otherwise isolated (maybe in a new city) and just hanging out with other company at the right moment makes a big difference in their life.
Also it’s odd to me to suggest that a university student has nothing useful to share. If you’re a first-year student that’s struggling, another student who’s familiar with what that’s like in 2024 could be exactly who you need to speak to.
when you are alone facing a problem, sometimes it is difficult to sort through it all, and then it helps to have a second person to confirm things, or help you step through the problem with a fresh mind until the right solution becomes self evident
in summary, you are not sharing your knowledge but your experience and the wisdom that you have acquired over the years. and a lot of that is not specific to your career but simply a factor of being older/ having worked longer. in theory any 50 year old could be a mentor to any 30 year old. we just seek out people with a similar background because it is more likely that we understand each other.
Whoops :-)
You, as the “mentor” will learn a lot. Some people you meet will advocate for you in career opportunities, it’s practice for interviewing, it broadens your exposure to problems in your space so you’re not just in an echo chamber of your own company’s problems.
https://softwaredoug.com/blog/2023/09/12/take-call-help-rand...
Want to back that up with something?
Some people would say “open source software,” but this struck others as a half-measure. The visibility of the source wasn’t the point, they would say. What matters is the freedom to do what you want with the software — https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
If someone says “this beer is free” it means you’re charged nothing for it. If someone says “this software is free” it means (in this context) that you have an inalienable right to use it as you please — like you have an inalienable right to speak freely.
When did they change this? I distinctly remember this previously being “free as in freedom, not as in beer.”
It’s always had to be further disambiguated by using “libre” and “gratis” — not sure “as in free speech” is better.
Update: welp, I must be misremembering. Wayback machine shows at least since 2010… so it’s either a reallly old framing or, I’m misremembering, completely!
As opposed to “free, as in freedom” to use the beer not just for drinking, but to redistribute, inspect, add ingredients to it, understand how it was made, etc.
That's not what freedom means!
That's more accurate.
On the opposite extreme there's "free as in vacation" such as high pressure sales tactics for a timeshare. :p