iPhone 15 Pro Storage Expansion – 128GB to 512GB [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
How can the new chip work if the original chip is milled off completely? I would be surprised if you could read all necessary identifiers through iOS/USB software before milling unless the device was jailbroken and read that way. Seems like a big oversight for Apple not to implement simple countermeasures to make it a little bit harder, or that Apple would undo protections they had back in the iPhone 6S days.
Would be weird in the actual mass production process if the flash would need to be pre-programmed somehow; one DFU process IMO must be able to do everything needed.
Also if there are two flash chips they need to be installed in a certain order. Not sure of the rationale behind that precisely. I doubt it's a hardware difference.
There's a tool for that (many, many of them), both software-based and physical-based tools that can copy out the SysCFG block and write it into a new chunk of flash.
sounds like a national security threat to me
https://www.solveyourtech.com/uncovering-where-iphones-are-m...
I don't repair/upgrade iPhones or anything, and I'm an EE not a trained technician, but I do need to swap BGAs from time to time and my rework rate for 0.4mm pitch BGAs is not the best. It works say, 3 of 4 times. But compared to colleagues I'm pretty good. But that rate is way too low to run any kind of viable business, I would think.
In this situation you're doing literally the same rework over and over, which helps, and probably have equipment and stencils specific to the job, which helps.
So I'm curious what kind of success rate was achieved if you don't mind sharing.
They: casually proceed to turn the original chip into fine dust
> Apple: our NAND flash is so integrated, that it's impossible to replace unless you literally machine it off the board. Surely no repair shop would do that!
> The repair shop: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbSDdU8bJI0&t=324s
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JbSDdU8bJI0&lc=Ugxs-u-AdfmJn...
Nobody sane would ever try to design a secure system that trusted commodity NAND parts. Secure boot and encrypted storage are literally the first things to tackle when trying to secure/lock down a device against hardware-based attacks.
And isn't the lid sensor issue more a matter of calibration rather than a security measure?
Your devices might have or receive information their government or just some company in the country wants.
You get detained for extra questioning. Your belongings get taken for review.
What parts could a reasonably skilled person quickly replace in less than 30 minutes that would compromise security? THOSE are the parts they’re worried about.
The threat model of someone trying to secretly grind off and replace your NAND without your knowledge is what, exactly?
Now, considering that the lid close sensor DRM leaves the laptop in the state that a hostile entity would want (including your example) - the laptop doesn't automatically lock, what is the security argument there?
He's running a repair shop, so used market.
>But. Uh. For all that work
The difference between 128GB and 512GB on the used iPhone 15 market is $200+. he's probably buying the 512GB NAND IC for $25-40. If you're a repair shop you already have all the needed tools and jigs except the maybe the CNC mill, which is about $3-4K. The only things we don't know is how long it takes and the failure rate, but the process (especially the CNC milling part) looks pretty consistent and repeatable, so I'd not be surprised to learn he's profiting off this.
Had no idea CNCing away BGA chips is a thing
And this person had better stay anonymous. If Apple knew their identity, they'd be excommunicated on the spot.
> KingSener is a registered trademark of our company in China, United Kingdom, United States and European Union. Our company specializes in supplying premium quality laptop batteries for global customers. We have more than 10 years experience in this industry,cost-effective products for customers and also produce customized products (OEM/ODM) as per buyers requirements.
What does scare me is the software side of doing a change like that!
Even pro DSLR camera bodies using top of the line Micro SD tend to fail, that's why they come with two slots that you write to in parallel.
// Also, iPhones since getting rid of SIM tray work after days to weeks under fresh or even salt water. That's harder to pull off with slots. More people need their phone to keep working after dropped in water than really need a MicroSD slot.
But I’ve never saw a real service that offers that or anything after M1 (I didn’t look though)
Wikipedia modchip https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modchip
But saving $200 to then need to expend this effort seems hardly worth it, never mind that it likely voids the warranty.
Maybe if it was already a few years old it might be worth it.
I suspect the video is to show off expertise rather than advertise this as a particular service they could economically offer.
It only took me several seconds to put a 512GB SD card in my Moto phone.
In practice(as a bare minimum):
- you need to patch the firmware for the new display
- patch out the radio
- ? patch battery capacity or re-init
Not sure how much of the patching part is possible atm.
WiFi can be locked to whitelisted SSIDs via Apple Configurator.
Sequential, 512 MB test size, 65536 test count.
Similar to the lightning cable, generates an artificial market. Making design choices against the best interests of the customer. Not sure why anyone would be Ok w that. Restricting users options, taking advantage really