Unlike your other examples, that one is an example of using crypto for nefarious reasons.
Unlike your other examples, that one is an example of using crypto for nefarious reasons.
The law pretends decidiing everything about right or wrong, but there are plenty of legitimate cases where the law is on the wrong side.
https://www.tiktok.com/@alphaaaroxy_teammoto/video/716155578...
The Diagolon that the House of Commons said was a "violent extremist organisation." but has never committed a crime ?
The same Diagolon that the RCMP determined: "DIAGOLON does not pose a criminal or national security threat." - Royal Canadian Mounted Police https://finance.yahoo.com/news/documents-reveal-shocking-rcm...
Diagolon is a meme and you don't get it, which is ok but stop spreading misinformation.
This doesn’t change the point that from the perspective of the Canadian government, they were facing 2 racist separatist groups at a time, and one of the groups was raising a LOT of cash while leading an occupation of the capital.
This is a valid scenario for seizing funds, though maybe the fact that groups like Diagalon and Wexit are a “meme” should be considered more closely.
Sure Wexit is a separatist group but I fail to see where you are getting racist from.
One of the originators of Diagolon is black.
If someone who is involved with multiple "Canada for Canadians" movements joins forces with a known racist, I would take the odds and bet good money that person is a racist.