A Scientist Says He Has the Evidence That We Live in a Simulation

I’ve heard there’s a saying in Spain: “Ponga la polla ala mesa” which i interpret basically as “your cards ain’t worth a damn unless you lay them down”.

Have previously read about the “second law of infodynamics” and it just kind of seem like a self-fulfilling prophecy bias to me. But I respect people for going all in on their ideas… How can it be disproven?

When ever I hear that word simulator, I have to tell a joke:

"Doc, doc.. the simulant in room 3 is dead." "Enough! Now, he's over exaggerating"

Opinions. Could prove. They believe. Me? I think it won't prove, I dont believe and probably their theory is less probative than they think, and in any case I don't see what ethical, or functional difference it makes.

If contextually reality is defined in this theory to be simulation in some higher reality, I'm content to keep living in this mode, in this reality thanks.

Assuming we were able to be given a viable restart/do-over button doesn't mean we should stop living. Axioms of this world in this run through aren't demonstrably mutable, so let's continue to obey the laws of physics.

Just some hand wavy arguments.