Stripe to start taking crypto payments starting with USDC stablecoin
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
https://www.frbservices.org/financial-services/fednow/organi...
https://www.moderntreasury.com/journal/fednow-launch
https://www.moderntreasury.com/questions/what-is-the-maximum...
Forex fees on credit cards tend to be painful outside of the US and wires aren't a viable option for most businesses.
[1] https://stripe.com/resources/more/cross-border-payments-expl...
Also, one problem with USDC is that there is not a single "USDC", every Blockchain has its own independent version of USDC. So advertising "USDC" is kind of meaningless, because you have to support Ethereum USDC, Solana USDC and so on.
Currently there are 93M wallets holding stablecoins with a weekly transfer of 373B[0].
They fail to support legitimate businesses and instead choose to support crypto, which is a world of grift and scams.
Has Stripe sold their ethics?
[0] https://solanabeach.io/validators [1] https://decrypt.co/216132/solana-outage-developers-say-could...
But unfortunately those behind the projects and the project's treasury itself has become quite rich from the increase in price and can support bizdev and grants (bribes).
I don’t think Stripe chose to demo Solana because of a grant.
Its incredible that the harm that SBF has done with Solana and other ponzi coins would get direct support from Stripe
There are valid complaints about Solana, but the ones that get trotted out in online discourse are repeated until they become reality for the horse beater. Unfortunately for them, their reality is disconnected from actual reality.
As far as I can tell there is no fundamental design flaws in Solana that makes it so that it will always go down. There are bugs in the networking stack that are being fixed.
An no, "engineers" don't bring it up. I run a validator and only i'm incentivized to restart it back up because of my stake.
Stake centralizing != less security. no amount of stake can allow validators to steal your funds, this affects only censorship resistance. So actual validator count is more important than superminority.
In case of USDC I'm assuming Circle should be running their own validator, which is the source of truth.
As someone who has used most networks, Solana has the best experience for transacting USDC.
Bitcoin, which is unfortunately many people's first introduction to crypto, takes on average 10 minutes per block. Typically services then wait for finality which is 6 blocks, so about an hour.
On Ethereum, each block is 12 seconds and 64 blocks for finality, so 12.8 minutes. If Stripe were smart, they'd be using an L2 like Base where block times are ~2s.
On Solana, each block .45s and 20-40s for finality. But Solana makes a lot of sacrifices and tradeoffs to achieve this and thus isn't on the same level as Ethereum.
Edit: From another article is appears they'll be using custody funds though, at least to start. So in that case transactions should be instant due to a centralized layer as you mention.
And don't try to compare that with L2 because there's a huge difference with having this happen at the base layer.
There isn't such thing as "finality" in bitcoin right? The probability of another chain growing longer just dramatically shrinks each extra block mined (as most of the mining power will quickly shift to the longest known chain).
There is also a lot of historical data as the bitcoin blockchain has been running for many years. How many times has a chain with a 2-block lead been surpassed? It seems like the data is out there to create a pretty accurate graph for by-chance reversal for a given number of confirmations. (Intentional reversing is a bit of a different issue but you should be able to estimate the computation costs as well).
If you live in a county with a functional and stable financial system then this announcement isn’t for you. If you live in xyz country where getting a credit card is a big challenge this will make it easier to shop online.
They aren't inherently a scam, but that doesn't mean that they can't be part of a scam.
Luna had a "stablecoin" but that turned out to be a scam, but that doesn't mean all stablecoins are scams.
Circle's treasury is (iirc) 1:1 with USD and T-Bills. If those fail the way Luna did then there are bigger things to worry about.
USDC is just a one-to-one stablecoin where for every coin issued there is one redeemable US dollar somewhere. People have accused Tether, which works on the same principle, of being a scam by not actually having a dollar for every USDT, but there's nothing inherently scammy or non-scammy about the system. It's like a bank, either they have the reserves they claim or they're committing fraud.
Their cash burn over the years has been astonishing. It seems like a very difficult business to make money in, somewhat ironically. Sort of a "water water everywhere" situation.
I think it’s about time to move off Stripe to other payment providers that don’t accept crypto since Stripe is becoming more hostile and banning customers and shutting down their accounts for no reason.
I am betting that Stripe chose crypto to avoid more chargebacks (that crypto does not support)
but I don't know which payment processor like Stripe can do the following:
- marketplace onboarding for buyers and sellers
- crowdfunding
- mass payouts/intermediary payouts
- doesn't hide fees for dashboard
> > These are not the same people.
> we are all aware
You wrote 'USDC/Tether is' as if that was a singular item. If you thought they were separate items you would have written 'why USDC and Tether are extremely shady'.
Start using Ethereum, it prevents this. Stop using intermediaries. The solution is right in front of you, but you're too distracted by the scams to see what the technology enables.
Yes it's unfortunate that so many scams exist and give the entire ecosystem a bad name, but scammers exist everywhere. Is email a scam because of scammers? Are phones a scam because of scammers? Is the stock exchange a scam because of scammers? No, and this is no different.
How do you get people with fiat to pay you in USDT/USDC?