> "The Supreme Court has ruled several ideas to be outside the bounds of what can be patented, including an algorithm for converting between binary number formats, the concept of hedging against the risk of commodity price changes, and the process of adjusting the dosage of a drug based on measured levels of a particular chemical in a patient's blood."

These all sound so fluffy but I guess there must be people out there trying to patent these type of things. Are they saying you can no longer patent a 'process'?