Lawsuit accuses GM of sharing drivers' data with insurers without consent
theregister.com
theregister.com
A big tool in removing our ownership rights has been increasing computerization--more and more repairs require a trip to a manufacturer-controlled dealership just to get permissions to use already-working hardware.
Electric motors should be simpler and easier to fix than an ICE, but things are going toward more complexity not less.
I literally have never seen a digital feature on a vehicle that didn't actively make my experience worse. I have a phone with all the music I want; just give me an aux port; I don't want your shite music software or SiriusXM. Why am I waiting for my backup camera to load? Cool, you moved all the temperature and volume settings to a touch screen, so now I have to pull over to the side of the road to adjust them safely?
While it seems you and I are mostly on the same page, I'd go further and say that this isn't consent. Yes, the law says it's consent, but that's the problem: the law is wrong.
The New York Times reported a sales person admitted enrolling people without consent.[1]
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/23/technology/general-motors...
Florida Man Sues G.M. and LexisNexis Over Sale of His Cadillac Data
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/14/technology/gm-lexis-nexis...
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39709991
General Motors Quits Sharing Driving Behavior with Data Brokers
It might be better for people to add their own smarts to vehicles (remote starters, etc) that they might have more control over.
it would never recede. it must move from less control towards more control, not less. this is terrible and we should fight it, but we'll lose anyways.
I found a way to detach the wireless dongler tucked up behind my glove box. The only side effect was my little digi-compass not telling me which direction I was pointing anymore.
I don't think they let you do that anymore.