Tesla has lowest maintenance and repair cost of any brand
electrek.co
electrek.co
[0] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/18/business/hertz-ceo-departure-...
Also, collision repairs likely represent only a fraction of total maintenance costs.
Also makes sense to exclude collision repairs - as an individual owner I am not going to run to a shop to repair scratch or gash - I am perfectly happy with mechanically worthy car that has imperfect looks (thats why I maxed out excess on my insurance).
> When comparing cumulative costs by brand for years one through five
> and six through 10, we found that Tesla had the lowest maintenance costs.
If the quote from the article is correct (I haven't looked on CR's site), Consumer Reports' claim is specifically about maintenance, not repair.Hertz's situation was particularly noteworthy because of how much their purchases of Teslas affected the company itself, though that was partially because Hertz started to firesale their Tesla fleet just as Tesla itself lowered prices, further exacerbating the loss.
[1] https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-maintenance/the-cos...
Such a consumer would be comparing typical maintenance and repair costs, fuel costs, insurance costs, license and registration costs, and probably others I am forgetting.
If that's the case then I'd expect collision repairs to not be included in maintenance and repair costs, because collision repairs are usually handled by insurance. If a particular car is more expensive to repair after a collision that would show up in higher insurance rates and so when comparing cars is accounted for when your compare insurance costs.
Could tip the balance if your business model is to rent them out to Uber drivers though, and if those are more likely to hit or be hit by other cars.
But Tesla claims 300k - 500k miles before the battery comes due for a replacement. Most of the very oldest Teslas haven't reached that mileage yet. The average drive certainly doesn't reach it in their first 10 years of owning their car.
Sounds like something insurance companies (or government) should offer. Would cost extra $1 per customer, but would keep tons of drivers happy.
Small car, common model. From the junkyard, but much newer than my toasted one.
I know, not the same thing. I wonder why the comparison was made at all, I'm just following up.
My Tesla is 10 years old (as of this coming July). I bought the extended warranty when they still offered it, which covered me for 8 years (amazing).
I'm really glad I did too, under warranty, I've had 2 door handles replaced, a new motor, a replaced computer.
What would seem more relevant is the type of car, so SUVs vs Sedans etc even if you want to group it further by brand after that.
I can’t imagine a truck would have the same maintenance as a compact.
But most Hybrids are Toyotas, and most PHEV's aren't.
Maintenance, repair, insurance, fuel, residual value.
I would think Tesla’s lower residual value from price declines would result in a poorer(possibly much poorer) showing using a total cost of ownership framework.
And I would think Toyota, especially Toyota plug-in hybrids, would get a strong boost in total cost of ownership rankings.
Wouldn’t an important inflection point for EVs be winning a total costs of ownership comparison with Toyota plug in hybrids?
https://www.consumerreports.org/media-room/press-releases/20...
Who wrote this? Elon Musk?
That said, wear can be substantially mitigated by how the tyres are designed and manufactured, particularly the tread compounds. But, long-wearing compounds are generally inversely correlated with grip, so there is a balance to be found there.
There is also the fact that manufactured seem to absolutely not GAF about weight anymore, even on internal-combustion cars, so the ICE-vs-EV weight difference may be narrowing.
But yes, tires for heavier cars are more expensive by themselves, and ceteris paribus, wear faster, so can definitely be a significant expense factor over the 5-10 year terms in this article and discussion.
Especially considering that it's common knowledge in motorsports (although evidently less common than it should be) that more power only increases acceleration performance, but lighter weight increases performance of acceleration, braking, cornering, and tyre wear! Plus, reducing weight is compounding; take out one chunk of mass, and other components can also be made lighter, e.g., reduce the body mass, and you can fit lighter suspension components, brakes, wheels, tires, etc., and the light-weighting compounds.
I drive year-round in a cold/hot climate with winter tires (because I'm too lazy to do the seasonal swap out). It is pretty hard on winter tires to run them in 100F days. But, so far, in the last 7 years of winter tires, I've gone through 2 sets.
Tires are the least of my annoyances with Tesla. Lack of quality control, lack of good customer service, and a fascist dictator at the helm have all prevented me from considering another Telsa.
The quote they have from Consumer Reports is solely on maintenance cost. Which gets a "no shit" from me. EVs don't need engine maintenance. Brakes last forever due to regenerative breaking.
Regeneranive braking is 1/100 of a normal brake ability. It can be upto 10/100 if using resistors instead of the battery as the load.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_claimed_to_be_b...