Companies are there to make money for the owners and thats it, not on some altruistic missions.
I think OP could be better served in academia as long as he keeps greed for money at bay, which some manage better than others over time.
Companies are there to make money for the owners and thats it, not on some altruistic missions.
I think OP could be better served in academia as long as he keeps greed for money at bay, which some manage better than others over time.
It's a general rule in life that the more 'fun' or 'fulfilling' your job is, the more likely it is to pay peanuts.
What OP needs is enough financial stability and political will that they can do whatever they want. This can be slowly achieved by grinding at a corporation, taking political control and grinding or by violence / threat of violence.
There's of course a lot of bullshit, but you can sort of choose the tradeoff between bullshit and career development/stability. If you're OK with a high chance of never getting a permanent job, in many places you can do practically whatever you want.
And if you e.g. know how to code, you can usually go to the industry churn as a backup when your grant streak runs out.
But yes, in the bigger picture, the latter are the sustainable course of action. There's only so many, or rather frew, grants.