I suppose if my software job gets automated out of existence, I can go to work flipping burgers.
I suppose if my software job gets automated out of existence, I can go to work flipping burgers.
To some extent this was also true of the other professionals. But they'd usually shake it once they got humbled by seeing up close how fast a good cook can actually shuck perfect oysters or just calmly handle the intensity of the line during dinner. Never saw a programmer adapt to it.
Mostly I'm just disappointed that apparently we're determined to make humans toil in order to free up the robots to create art; I rather preferred the opposite vision.
Are we "determined" to do that, or did art just turn out to be vastly easier to automate than anything involving the manipulation of actual physical objects?
I'm sure it could save some labor, but you know the thing probably costs a hundred thousand dollars and also comes with a SaaS contract that's twice what a worker would cost already. And you still need a worker to get stuff out of the freezer and load up whatever hopper the machine is working out of.
Almost all cooking steps in a McDonalds kitchen involves a timer and some form of automation. The humans run the overall process and final assembly, but automation - microwaves, warming ovens, toaster belts, auto-rise fry baskets, grill timers - runs all the repetitive and standardized cooking sub-processes.