In the Democratic party, there's the group advocating for involvement on the basis of individual rights and one on the basis of supporting the post-WWII rule of law world order.
In the Republican party, there's still the group advocating for American exceptionalism. However, given that Republican presidents initiated the last two major wars (Afghanistan and Iraq), general party support for military interventionalism is at a low ebb. Give it a few more years for memories to reset (~2028).
And theres always shareblue monitoring forums, which is deeply embedded with spooks.
Unelecteds heavily vote democrat/big government because of job security. They don't care about your rights hence pro-FISA. As a matter of fact it appears many of them believe your rights are afforded to you by the government, which seems very totalitarian.
If you want a substantive discussion, try dropping the fear-words like "unelected"s: this isn't the Fox News comment section.
Do facts scare you because they are certainly unelected as in not elected to the office they hold. What word would make you feel better, @ethbr1?
I assume you are not an American.
What's your point?
The above comment is an excellent example of what type of comment should be grey texted into oblivion.
Or do I misunderstand the American system of government?
https://apnews.com/article/federal-employee-job-protections-...
You sure seem awfully defendant of FISA and government abuse. Why is that?
Do you think that was better?
And if not, how would you propose re-politicizing civil service positions without falling victim to spoils again?