> This access is considered a taxable income.
Sounds like this meets the definition of racketeering
Sounds like this meets the definition of racketeering
It's just a bad tax policy that creates weird incentives ("use the canteen even if you don't need it"). Let's keep the word racket for criminal enterprises and antivirus companies.
Which is fine in general, just not specific to this particular tax.
If we think this tax is a racket, we should equally think that all taxes are a racket. That's because your "Try not paying it" argument applies to all taxes.
If we think this tax is uniquely bad, there should be another reason that it's bad. Which is my point.