Author here. I think our issue is that many recruiting tools are built on top of naive ChatGPT... because most recruiting solutions don't have the training data to fine-tune. So whatever biases are in ChatGPT persist in other products.
I'm not talking at all about fine tuning, simply building a process with multiple prompts and multiple stages, taking advantage of the things that AI can do well, instead of trying to jam an entire resume down the AI's throat and hoping for the best.
My beef with both the Bloomberg article and the response to it is that they're analyzing a poorly thought out and inappropriate use of a technology in a way that is almost guaranteed to cause unintended problems - like measuring how long it takes people to dig holes with a shovel without a handle. It's not a sensible thing to do, and the Bloomberg journos aren't acting in good faith, anyway - they'll continue attacking AI and reaping clicks until they figure out some other way to leech off the AI boom.