SpaceX to relaunch rocket Tuesday 12:44 AM PST/ 3:44 AM EST
latimes.com
latimes.com
Will be a strange new world when one can put 'what ever they want' into orbit if they have the cash. Yes, I know that up to now that has been handled by 'the brotherhood' (this is what I heard a Lockheed engineer call the set of public and private actors that were the components of the US space program).
I'm really excited to someone putting up the ULA long duration vehicle [1] (an internal combustion engine in space, how cool is that?) and depots with fuel for things to move around. That will be a new day indeed.
[1] http://www.ulalaunch.com/site/docs/publications/Integrated%2...
What I can't understand is the disparraging nature of a lot of the coverage. Both Slate and the Wall Street Journal had really snarky commentary this morning about the delayed launch. There were many people poking fun at them on Twitter.
Meanwhile, as someone who actually follows this stuff, I was amazed by their ability to shut down the rocket after ignition without damage. I'm also impressed by the fact they're able to refire the engine almost immediately. You can't do that with every rocket ever made. Not only is the Merlin engine cheaper, it's better (than some). That's something to be proud of.
And even if the journalist doesn't know enough about rockets to be impressed that a failure didn't lead to the thing blowing up on the launch pad, they're acting as if government launches don't get delayed repeatedly. The Space Shuttle would seemingly only actually liftoff about 50% of the time they said it would. It's hardly a major set back that they pushed it back 48 hours. Why does it seem like people want this to fail?
Here is a countdown timer until 3:44:38 EDT (the scheduled launch): http://www.timeanddate.com/counters/customcounter.html?msg=S...
Doesn't look like they have a countdown yet.