2 cups water to 1 cup rice seems a lot easier and more flexible. To cook a bit more rice, use a bigger cup.
2 cups water to 1 cup rice seems a lot easier and more flexible. To cook a bit more rice, use a bigger cup.
So, if you only vary amount of rice, you really need some_factor * amount_of_rice + constant_amount and the knuckle rule has that characteristic.
I'm surprised that there would be significant evaporation loss in a pot with a close-fitting lid for 20 minutes on low heat. If you heated the water on its own I wouldn't expect a large amount to boil off... Although now I say that, I'm not so sure, maybe I should run that experiment.
I would have guessed the imprecision of 'knuckle depth' being uncalibrated with the volume of rice and the size of the pot would be greater than the imprecision of a pure volume ratio due to evaporation, but I can see that the knuckle depth thing might make sense if you're always cooking roughly the same amount of rice in roughly the same size of pot.
I've had good success cooking rice by the 2:1 ratio in both large and small amounts in various pots, so I'm still happy to vouch for that method.
If you're cooking about a cup of rice (which is a nice big amount with a standard measuring cup -- hard to imagine needing more unless you're cooking for 5+ people) that comes out the same as my 2:1 ratio.
Does that work if you're making a smaller amount, like a quarter or half cup of rice? Seems like it would be too much water.
https://greedy-panda.com/2020/06/the-rice-measuring-cup-expl...
On the other hand, sometimes I get lazy and cook rice like pasta, which works fine. Arbitrary amount of salted water - 5:1 or whatever - then just boil it, 'til it feels like it has the right texture, and strain it.