Forcing master to main was a good faith exploit
world.hey.com
world.hey.com
Personally, I thought the change was a bad idea because it seemed to be based on a mixture of parochial USA politics and a fear of twitter mobs, rather than any real evidence of a high benefit to disruption ratio, but what's done is done, we can't change the way the world works.
Is there more context that is missing from this 173 word gripe?
"There was someone who forcefully wanted a change and I went along with it. But then the next word battle started. After this, next .. And now I learned from the situation, because no one will foole me twice"
I think there has been some experience with this kinds. I can also say, with my former employer, the new PR suddenly brought up this issue. Since then we needed to proofread everything and change our ways of thinking. I'm not against, let me say, woke-ness. Each argument starts with words and can end up in a war - so does discrimination, too.
But you can't rape a language and force everything to be gendered. And that's the problem;
Force.
So maybe this happened alike and is the missing context? May be there has been a war in the project between the wokers and the sleepers? Also, may be because of this, someone had been mobbed out, or, made shut up with force? ... Such discussions are healthy for both side :)