No, we're not doing NAT, but the devices aren't really accessible from the wide web either. In this case "NAT" is just an implementation detail and getting rid of it didn't bring any of the benefits IPv6 promised.
> No, we're not doing NAT, but the devices aren't really accessible from the wide web either.
Which is a policy issue (implemented through rules on a firewall), and not an inherent limitation of the technology (like NAT is).