Hacker News Reader

Comment by boringg | Hacker News Reader

Anyone have anything above speculation on what is the potential reasoning here?

A different take - the FBI is absolutely going to open a criminal negligence case in any disaster like this, even without direct suspicion, because there's a reasonable possibility there was negligence just by the nature of the incident.

Agreed. From NTSB's website[0]: "In cases of suspected criminal activity, other agencies may participate in the investigation. We do not investigate criminal activity. Our focus is solely on transportation safety and determining probable cause. If a transportation tragedy is determined to be a criminal act, local law enforcement or the FBI becomes the lead investigative body."

The FBI opening a case does not guarantee that someone will be charged with a crime per se, but the timing of this announcement coming weeks after the collapse, not hours or days after, suggests its not simply a procedural matter. Rather that something was found and given to the FBI to investigate further.

0: https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/process/Pages/default.as...

Perhaps to do with detaining members of the ship crew in the US?

Got it - thanks for the hypothesis.

According to WaPo:

> a probe that will look at least in part at whether the crew left the port knowing the vessel had serious systems problems, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the matter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/04/15/balitmore...

It is illegal for bridges to fall down. If it isn't, it should be! (Sarcasm, of course).

Often things like this are a technicality somewhere, where the FBI needs the funds unlocked to do X Y and Zed and the way to unlock them in this case is a criminal investigation.

From article seems like there may have been known problems before they departed.

You can look at earlier bridge collapses / shipping lane incidents for reference. BrickImmortar has a nice youtube channel for that.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com