True, but what do I as a customer care? It's not like I'm building some business on their APIs or anything.
If they go down, I will switch to another search engine… no need to do so preemptively from my PoV.
If they go down, I will switch to another search engine… no need to do so preemptively from my PoV.
So, it does not matter that "all search engines are problematic in terms of privacy"-- this one is marketed to not be. That's why people have concerns about how serious they're taking that committment and why people would hold them to a higher standard. It's also why a sale to a company which does not respect privacy is potentially a major issue, especially if current customer data isn't being handled in the manner they had expected.
The complaint is about the marketing for sure. But that's not so different from the other "privacy-oriented" engines I'm aware of.
I'm not saying Kagi is (or is not, I don't know) being a good actor here. I'm just saying that if you want to use a search engine at all, you're effectively having to choose the lesser of evils.
Kagi may not be a saint, but since there aren't better options, I'm willing to settle with a search engine that actually gives me useful search results and isn't totally egregious on privacy issues.