(Also, how do you guys function with those strange units? Therms, BTU/hr, etc. - all so confusing. Surely electrification and the shift to heat pumps could be a convenient excuse to start using watts (kW in this magnitude) for heat and joules (usually MJ) for gas!)
(You get used to whatever units you're using, and the US units make some calculations easier and others harder. If I could switch it all over to the SI system without massive transition costs I would, though!)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39144329 has a bit of details on the experiment I ran back in 2022 to prove 135°F flow would work for us. (If you have a condensing boiler, you can run this experiment safely; if you have a non-condensing boiler, you can run it, but not for very long as you'll be damaging the flue and boiler with condensation at these lower temps.)
My outdoor reset curve (sadly, on a gas combi boiler because of the "pretty unusual product" factors) is now set to 105°F at 55°F OAT and 154°F at 0°F OAT (which is lower than the design temperature here, but it gave me more resolution to tweak the line to fit the loss just right; it's spot-on on the lower end, with the system running 22-24 hours per day when it's cold out and stays that way up until around freezing, where the utilization falls off).
Matching the gain to the loss quite closely has resulted in a house that's the most comfortable since we moved in in 2007 and gas bills with the combi went down about 46% (versus a 1990s oil-to-gas conversion of a 1950s boiler, so not a realistic comparison for anything that wasn't built by General Motors [not a typo]).
Even our cast iron radiators are smaller than you might expect for the age of the house, because they were designed for water above its normal boiling point (using mercury pressure: https://www.jefftk.com/p/mercury-spill).
But, you've already discovered your reset curve with modern equipment, so you know the right answer for your place.
Thanks for the story on mercury pressurization! Fascinating. I learned a lot about our old house (originally gravity circulated as well, but near as I can tell, pressurized only to the typical 12-15 psi and with an in-ceiling green steel expansion tank: https://structuretech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Old-sch... )
(And of course, sorry to hear about your contamination inconvenience and expense!)
I think the challenge is determining how much energy you save. I guess we could run the calculations and back out nat gas savings.
Managing the microcontrollers might be a bit of a pain though.
Over here they're called hybrid heat pumps and are quite popular. (At least with those that offer to sell them.) They're used in improving existing gas powered solutions. The heat pump takes most (or usually all) of the heating, while the existing gas heater provides hot water and can add peak heat if needed.
Popular brands here are:
- Remeha, with the types Elga Ace, Mercuria, and Mercuria Ace - Nefit/Bosch with Nefit EnviLine hybrid and Bosch Compress 7400i AW - Vaillant aroTHERM plus/pro/split
There's also the Quatt Hybrid, which I haven't heard of before, but it looks nice. And according to their website it has a large market share.
I'd argue that's politically motivated and very deliberate however...
http://ets.aeso.ca/ets_web/ip/Market/Reports/CSDReportServle...
I would love it if there were a service or some code to look at 1) gas prices 2) electricity prices 3) how efficient the two systems are and switch back and forth depending. Like... if it's -10C out, run the gas. As it gets closer to 0C, switch over at some point.
If gas is flat out always cheaper, you could still put a cutoff point where you're willing to spend a bit more because it's better for the environment.
In many regions electricity isn't as cheap as ours though, so that changes the game.