The abundant fossil fuel you’ve never heard of
features.csmonitor.com
features.csmonitor.com
If you're worried about the frost thawing and releasing the methane into the atmosphere (especially with a positive feedback), it seems prudent to burn it into water and CO2 (which already has to be dealt with) while it's still concentrated.
But I question the use of methane gas hydrates. There is no denying methane gas is one of the worse gas responsible for the green house effect. The article makes it seem like methane gas hydrates is a solution but in the end it's not a renewable source of energy. It would still be harvested and drilled for like oil and even though there's the trillions of cubic feet of gas to be had, one day it could run out.
Why does it matter that it will run out?
True only if the methane is present in the atmosphere. In this case it is trapped in ice or under water.
One day the Sun will become a red giant and expand beyond the orbit of Mars.
http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html
"Oh, hell, just about forever. Till the sun runs down, Bert."
"That's not forever."
"All right, then. Billions and billions of years. Twenty billion, maybe. Are you satisfied?"
That being said, is this really the solution to the fuel crisis? Acknowledging that we are running out of a fossil fuel should change behavior, not encourage more of the same.
The idea is that the deposits will spontaneously burp up an enormous quantity of methane from time to time. This causes the ocean to turn into a foam that's much less dense than water: ships sink like rocks in the stuff.
Apparently it also causes some kind of ionization or static charge in the air that can cause navigation instruments to go haywire.
Again, interesting and very much half-baked.