Hacker News Reader

Comment by ericcumbee | Hacker News Reader

Which is an outstanding book series, and while they took some liberties with the tv show I thought it was outstanding as well.

View on HN

A word of warning, though: the series is dark and extremely depressing. I would not recommend it for people struggling with depression.

Hey, it's not Evangelion. Depressed people should be fine.

Depression is not something that you cure or worsen depending on what TV show you watch.

Depends. It can have an effect.

If an insight changes how you see the world it most definitely can have an effect on your existing condition.

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2019/release-of-1...

> Release of “13 Reasons Why” Associated with Increase in Youth Suicide Rates

Maybe read in full what you are quoting. Correlation, causation, coincidence, all that.

The design of the study itself precludes showing causal linkage. That does not mean it does not exist. At the very least, the existence of this data should increase the odds that you believe a causal connection exists compared to there being no increases in suicides relating to popular media centered on suicide.

I guess I should have followed your methodology and simply asserted my point without providing any supporting evidence. That would have been much better surely.

I spoke from experience.

I just found out that around the same time the Chinese also released a 30 episode version as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Body

The Netflix show it's a complete insult to the source material, but I was expecting this anyway, there is no way to honor good writing in the West anymore, everything needs to be adapted for the modern audience... I could only forcefully stomach 20 minutes before giving up to the strong female arch, the gimmicky witty/silliness of John Bradley's character that is essentially another version of his character on Game of Thrones...

The Chinese one is true rendition the books needed. It's slow paced but it is a triumph

Are you aware that they asked the author who gave his blessing to "adapt" the series to a global audience?

Also, giving up because there is a strong female arch? Damn. Macho much?

I have heard PRC-native Chinese females complain about misogyny in the original text, so I think they are getting out ahead of something here.

Yes, the original text clearly has issues. Like when the author explains that it's really a shame that the UN secretary general is a woman when the crisis happens, because a man would have handled the impeding war better. He backpedals a bit in book 3 - suddenly that secretary general is a shrewd political operator who managed to make the UN powerful through various schemes.

Also, don't call women "females", wtf??

I generally don't, I was following GP.

Shi Qiang's assistant on the true adaptation (the Chinese series), is a female character that is smart and strong without having to give her super-powers so the modern audience can indulge in their delusions.

Adaptations should stick to the source material, not bend over backwards to appease the culture war zealots.

I'm confused: the book had a strong female character, and the TV show added the same strong female character because culture war?

I'm assuming it's a two-step thing where "strong female with superpowers" offends, not strong female arch[sic].

What were the offending superpowers?

Read the books, watch the shows, post a comment. That should be your character arc.

Okay lets say I'm like the other commenters, read it, and still don't know. How can I check in with you again on what the superpowers are?

If it makes you feel any better https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2024/03/29/more-bodies-mo...

Superpowers? Delusions? What are you talking about? I literally just watched the show (and read the book a few years ago). I cannot tell what you are referring to. Everything that happens in the show, happened in the book too, as far as I can tell.

Interesting indeed, a triumph, no.

I found the stuff about the cultural revolution by far the most interesting, finally I could understand it - that there was nothing to understand, there was no underlying rationale; it was just madness.

Agree. Hard to adapt for TV but thought they did a better job than the other streaming service with Foundation. In general loving the spike in SciFi drama after a long drought.

I thought the first one was mediocre. The Da Vinci Code is a better book. Better writing for sure. The story seemed ripe for a film/TV series, though (not necessarily a good one).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com