Guide to bourbon
seriouseats.com
seriouseats.com
https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/what-is-whiskey-fungus
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/01/us/whiskey-fungus-jack-da...
I enjoyed Scottish, Irish and Japanese whisky but never had any memorable bourbon.
I admit I only had the low end (?) stuff like Four Roses, Wild Turkey, Jim Beam or Maker's Mark. Maker's was probably best whereas Jim or Four Roses is absolutely not my cup of tea.
How much do I need to spend? Some amounts in the comments are a bit wild, for $40 I can get a Laphroaig 10yo and that's pretty nice drink.
$25: Elijah Craig
$30: 375ml Jack Daniel’s Single Barrel Barrel Proof
$35: Eagle Rare
$40: Angels Envy
$45: Woodford Reserve Double Oaked
$50: Old Forester 1920
$60: Wild Turkey Rare Breed
If Makers is your favorite, you can also try Makers Cask Strength or 46.
This is coming from a big Laphroiag 10 fan too
The "Van Winkle" stuff is not measurably better than the cheapest Knob Creek, IMO.
Yeah, cocktail bourbons have a lower bar.
Only a few states have high taxes or poor competition (only gov stores) and that’s not Bourbon specific that’s just liquor in general.
Ultimately, prices have gone up only because it’s so easy for the average person to get a great bottle of Eagle Rare that takes 10 years to make. The demand is there at the price point, it’s not like a hedge fund is buying up stock to hoard it.
Yes, Eagle Rare 10 is a good value for a 10yo, if you can find it around the MSRP ($30). However, it's commonly going around $50. It's also worth noting that the theory is they are thinning out the barrels that are good but not great - leaving the great barrels for the longer aging lines (not sure how true that is for this line). Usually the consistency/quality is all per the place at the lower end, and I've noticed more of it in the mid level segments now too.
Yeah, I get there is demand. The international market is driving a lot of that in recent years. The market is also seeing huge gains in popularity/consumption in the wealthier segments. Hedge funds might not be buying it up, but there are some people investing in bottles like there are some people doing so with wine. That's really only going to affect the top level exclusive stuff though.
But if you have a suggestion of a "great" bourbon for only $25, please let me know and I will check them out. I've found plenty of good mixer bourbons at that level and a few decent bourbons whose consistency/QC was wildly different from one bottle to the next.
There's Early Times Bottled in Bond, $27 for 1L: https://www.totalwine.com/spirits/bourbon/early-times-bottle...
Barton 1792 for $27: https://www.totalwine.com/spirits/bourbon/small-batch-bourbo...
and Old Grandad 100 for $22: https://www.totalwine.com/spirits/bourbon/old-grand-dad-100/...
Knob Creek 9 I see around $45 for a handle which is like $20 for 750ml too.
Of course, they're no Old Forester 1920, Rare Breed, JD Single Barrel Proof, or Woodford Double Oaked, but I still think they're "great" and is really all one really needs when most people are busy chugging Jim Beam White Label.
On a side note, one local place sells white whiskey - aged the legal minimum of 1 day. But it was also less than 50% of the normal whiskey they sell. I got some just to try it. It is not mellow at all, but it is interesting to try it, and it mixes in many drinks just fine and makes them different.
The off flavor bottom shelf stuff doesn't interest me - I still consider it overvalued for what you actually. An iconic example of this for Scotch would be Old Smuggler. I'd rather drink my homemade beer, wine, and mead - dirt cheap and usually good stuff.
Joking aside, I'm looking forward to reading the Irish Whisky guide linked there.
My highly scientific verdict is that there are only two truly good industrial alimentary products made in the United States: bourbon and clam chowder. It could be an interesting experiment to live on only these two.
My local supermarket - totally agree - is on average worse than average European fare. But if you travel a few towns away and go to the more premium ones like Mariano's or Whole Foods, it's a lot better.
Other places I shop for really good food are definitely somewhat more foreign to be fair: Seafood City, Mitsuwa, H-Mart, Brookhaven. (That last one is my favorite, and is heavy on eastern European foods like tea, dried fish, wine, cheese, beer, etc.)
Other honorable mentions: Harris Teeter, Trader Joe's, Wegman's, Fresh Market.
* Real slow-cooked barbecue is excellent
* Salmon from the Pacific Northwest is great and the fresh stuff is seasonal.
* Beer and wine have improved a lot and are quite good in some places. TBH I prefer beer here in Oregon to the places I lived in Europe, Austria and Italy.
American seafood is pretty poor compared to Europe and other continents. Its always so expensive and hard to get. Local fish is really expensive. Local California prawns price are insane. Even that salmon will be 30/lb.
We also don't have a good culture if eating it general.
Yeah, but that's not commonplace in New York - but you're not wrong!
Also, American-ethnic foods are really good:
* American-Italian
* American-Asian
* American-Mexican
But yes, Europe has better wine, cheese, bread, and chocolate. But hey, we've got great bourbon! And our wine and cheese are getting much better! But our bread is cake (literally, in Europe) and our chocolate is garbage in comparison. There's really no point consuming the calories for American chocolate.
California wine is world class. You can’t say Europe is definitively better when you have phenomenal bottles coming out of Napa or Paso Robles like Austin Hope.
Then there’s https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_of_Paris_(wine)
And a painful death, most likely...
Anyway, there is plenty of good food in America. How much you'll find depends on which stores you go to and where they're located, as the cheaper stuff tends to be absolute garbage, but I've found crappy cheap junk foods in European store as well. The worst wine I've ever had by far was in Greece. (I was young, and it was a 1 euro for a bottle, IIRC.)
Truly local products don’t suffer this unfair comparison. One never drank a Swedish bourbon or ate clam chowder in Paris.
Maybe this is why Europeans are so attached to regional foods and their name protections. The diversity makes the experience more unique.
How much of it can be achieved without being "unhealthy" for you?
For example, I can think of some good barbecue or burgers or steaks. How many people don't have "portions too big" covered in too many unhealthy sauces/cheeses/etc.?
Say something basic is 600 calories. To make it good with mayonnaise, butter, cream, cheese, etc. you can quickly double the entire caloric intake for the meal.
You are either going to make a dish "good" through its texture (meat typically), spices, or savoriness/richness from fat of some sort, no?
You were expecting better? Every European who comes to the US complains about the food. Edit: Now that I think about it, so do a lot of the Indians.
If you can find it, give a watch of the episode "The Tick vs. Europe":
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0723382/
ETA: found it
The US Vegetarian cuisine isn't anything to write home about, so that's not surprising.
I've heard good things about south-east Asia, Thailand is pretty good supposedly, but I haven't been there.