The cited article is speculating on what the Fourth Dimension is. I'm just pointing out that there is already an accepted answer to that.
Nothing to stop others discussing the alternatives.
Nothing to stop others discussing the alternatives.
This is Euclidian geometry, much older and more 'accepted'.
I'm going to have to plead ignorance on this. Which will likely not surprise you.
I'll have more than the cursory read through the article in an attempt to educate myself.