> You may not access or use the Services in the following ways:
> ● To develop any products or services that supplant or compete with our Services, including to develop or train any artificial intelligence or machine learning algorithms or models
There is only one viable option in the whole AI industry right now:
Mistral
Rather I was pointing out that this clause in Anthropic’s TOS is so broad that if Claude ever adds code interpreter you can never use it as a code generator again.
That seems like a wild over-reading of the term. You're prevented from 'develop[ing] a product or service'. Using Claude to generate code without or without sandboxed execution is not developing a product or service.
If you're offering ab execution sandbox layer over Claude to improve code gen, and selling that as a product or service, and they launch an Anthropic Code Interpreter ... then you might have an issue? But "you can't undercut our services while building on top of our services" isn't a surprising term to find a SaaS ToS...
> (e) use Output (as defined below) to develop any artificial intelligence models that compete with our products and services. However, you can use Output to (i) develop artificial intelligence models primarily intended to categorize, classify, or organize data (e.g., embeddings or classifiers), as long as such models are not distributed or made commercially available to third parties and (ii) fine tune models provided as part of our Services;
> For example, you may not:
> Use Output to develop models that compete with OpenAI.
That’s even less reasonable than Anthropic because “develop models that compete” is vague
It’s a “use can use this as long as you not a threat and/or you’re an acquisition target” type license.