Bridges in the US are threaten by truck drivers relying on GPS meant for cars
apnews.com
apnews.com
For a layman that seems like a simple fix to deal with drivers who cannot read the signs. Shift the damage away from the bridge.
Does someone in the town administration make loads of money whenever the bridge is hit and a repair contract is handed out to their brother-in-law's firm?
People might not stop for warning lights, but a red light?
maybe add a sign under the red light - "your truck is too tall and will be destroyed if you continue"
Any or both of these ideas could be implemented for much less cost than bridge repairs and closures, I feel.
However, there's definitely trucks that ran the red light as well as there's little distance between the light and the bridge.
Two examples: GPS does not spy on you and tracks your every movement. But the navigation software might. GPS doesn’t tell you to go down the wrong road. But the navigation software might. Etc.
When GPS is trash talked, nobody understands that to be the satellite system.
And you can trash talk that all you want; it is immune to bad PR because it has no competition.
GPS is the American system, operated by the US Space Force. There are also GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, QZSS, and NavIC, operated by Russia, China, the EU, Japan, and India, respectively. Though QZSS and NavIC only have regional coverage.
I have no data, it's just a thought as I see the grid lock and every small side street full of cars. I see the main streets going super slow as people from the packed side streets push back into the main streets they avoided earlier. That means the main street itself is running 10x slower than it would otherwise, at least toward the start, as each car that enters at the start has to wait for the hundreds of cars merging in from side streets in front of it. Cars that were not doing that from side streets 20 years ago because their GPS maps were not directing them to
In traffic jams on motorways google often directs me to come off at a slip road only to immediately rejoin the motorway. These slip roads are fairly empty and thus my journey time improves.
The overall implication to the traffic jam is negative though. Everyone rejoining slows down traffic more than leaving it speeds traffic up.
Any time I see a "much too nice for this neighborhood" vehicle turning around, I know it's because their mapping software gives the impression of this being "a shortcut" (it is not).
Regardless, I loves me roadway to noway.
I bought a Garmin unit for my RV, the special one for RVs costs over $500 that avoids low bridges and allows you to set vehicle height. It doesn’t route near as well as Waze nor does it have as good of traffic info. Waze with vehicle height id easily pay $20 a month for, provided I could subscribe and unsubscribe for the winter while my RV is parked
I’ve heard of other RVers who have also used the Hammer navigation app used by truckers.
As a side note, OsmAnd supports setting vehicle height* and has support for multiple vehicles/routing profiles: https://osmand.net
*: and weight, width, and length
1. https://howmanydayssincemontaguestreetbridgehasbeenhit.com/
I’ve been watching these videos for years and despite adding increasingly prominent warnings and raising the bridge itself eight extra inches, idiots—often in Penske rental trucks—will still drive into the bridge and peel off the top of their box truck.
It's a rail bridge and the railroad was just improving the grade and just so happened to need to raise it those 8 inches.
[...] the town is considering installing a steel beam in front of the bridge to force trucks that are too tall to a full stop.
That sounds a lot like the operating principle of the famous Can Opener :)(btw, our cats love those videos on 11foot8.com and can watch them for hours)
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/transportation/vehicle-sa...
It does not look like repairs have even begun on the damage from 2023-02-10 (Knight Street, Cambie Overpass). There is still just a big chunk of concrete missing, with rebar sticking out of it, and the large direction sign which was there has yet to be replaced.
I was recently invited to a vendor dinner at a nice restaurant in a downtown area with no street parking and I had no transportation option beyond my work truck (clocking in at about 6' 5"). I had to resort to using street view to check the entrances to various parking structures and hope the picture was close enough/the text wasn't too blurry for me to read the warning bar. In the end, it worked! But it was a painful process.
No amount of signage can remedy this, the only way to fix it would be to raise the overpass, or to have the drivers gps route them more appropriately.
Where I am there's often a sign/bar over the road ahead of the bridge/underpass at the same height as the bridge ("IF YOU HIT THIS SIGN YOU WILL HIT THAT BRIDGE" etc).
Whilst there's not always enough room - I'm sure it would work with the bridges in most of the pictures in that article
Having a gigantic stop sign right in the traffic lane seems to be fairly effective[0] though it's absurd that's the length you have to go to to make people notice.
Incredibly funny, and also incredibly sad, because it's true. Weren't there cases of people dying from dehydration after being misled in some desert by their GPS?
This is a sad, sad issue of culture and education.
threaten -> threatened
Current HN title
> Bridges in the US are threaten by truck drivers relying on GPS meant for cars
An example I was given was that routine road maintenance might include resurfacing a stretch of the route. If some asphalt wasn't ground out beforehand, that new lift reduces the height from the road surface to the bottom of the bridge by a couple inches. If that was all the margin you had, clang!