The good thing is that the author of XL ( Jyrki's ) claims there are potential of 20-30% bitrate savings at the low end. So I hope JPEG XL encoder continues to improve.
The good thing is that the author of XL ( Jyrki's ) claims there are potential of 20-30% bitrate savings at the low end. So I hope JPEG XL encoder continues to improve.
We also provide a ~7000 lines-of-code libjxl-tiny that is more similar to jpeg encoders in complexity and coding approach, and a great starting point for building a hardware encoder.
This reminded of something. I so wish iOS 18 could support JPEG XL out of the box rather than Safari only. I have 80GB of Photos on my iPhone. Vast Majority of them were sent over by WhatsApp ( JPEG ). If iOS could simply recompress those into JPEG XL I would instantly gain ~10GB+ of storage.
It can be a question of if the photo fits as an email attachment etc.
'Zillions' of seconds of aggregate latency waiting time is spent each day on waiting for web sites to load. Back-of-the-envelope calculations can suggest that the value of reducing waiting time can be in hundreds of billions over the whole time of the deployment. Bandwidth cost to users and energy use may also be significant factors.