And even though there were cost cuts they're still off by $1.8B.
Also $8.5B is in direct funding and access to up to $11B in federally backed (and discounted) loans. [1]
[0] https://archive.is/nfURY [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/us-chi...
A CEO that oversees a loss of $1B could be doing a great job if you think the counterfactual was a loss of $2B.
A CEO that oversees a profit of $3B could be terrible if you think the counterfactual was a profit of $4B.
For the most part it is irrelevant to 3rd parties, because CEO compensation comes out of shareholder compensation, so it is their money to spend or throw away based on their assessment.
Gelsinger destroyed VMWare's focus and market prowess. His time at Intel looks unsurprisingly very similar.
In my opinion, the interesting question and the only one with relevance is what the BOD thinks and why.
Does the board think Gelsinger is destroying the company?
You really think the BoD cares much about anything other than their profits? The board is the last place to look for an honest opinion. They're all friendlies of Gelsinger.