Hacker News Reader

Comment by toomuchtodo | Hacker News Reader

> We may use what you provide to ChatGPT to improve our models for everyone.

I believe OpenAI has elected to eat the compute cost in order to teach the model faster to stay ahead of competitors. How much are you willing to pay as the robot gets better faster? Everyone fighting over steepness of the hockey stick trajectory.

Anyone can buy GPUs, you can’t buy human attribution training. You need human prompt and response cycle for that.

View on HN

I agree, GPT-4 is still the undisputed king in LLMs, it's been a wee bit more than a year since it came out. I'm sure that the quality of GPT-5 will depend more on a carefully curated training set than just an increase in their dataset size, and I think they're really good at that.

Also, very few people know as much as sama about making startups grow, so ...

PS. I'm not even a fan of "Open"AI, but it is what it is.

It's more of a disputed king these days, lots of benchmarks show Claude Opus ahead and a fair few people do prefer it.

Yup, Claude is my go-to now. Both models seem equally "intelligent" but Claude has a better sense of when to be terse or verbose + the responses seem more natural. I still use GPT4 when I need code executed as Anthropic hasn't implemented that yet (though this "feature" can be annoying as some prompts to the GPT4 web interface result in code being executed when I just wanted it to be displayed).

No joy:-(

Unfortunately, Claude.ai is only available in certain regions right now. We're working hard to expand to other regions soon.

ironically the API is available most everywhere, and it has an ok-ish web interface (they're really heavy on prompt engineering it seems though)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com