Does this mean, had this exploit gone unnoticed, the attacker could have executed arbitrary commands as root without even a single sshd log entry on the compromised host regarding the 'connection'?
Does this mean, had this exploit gone unnoticed, the attacker could have executed arbitrary commands as root without even a single sshd log entry on the compromised host regarding the 'connection'?
If the EDR is capable of intercepting the forks, clone() execves, open(), etc, then you can follow the traces. If it's able to deny certain activity based on rules like modifying /etc/ld.so.preload or download files with curl/wget, it'd have made the attacker's life a bit more difficult.
If the attacker loaded a rootkit, then probably you'd have lost visibility of what the attacker did after that. Also not all the EDRs hook all the functions, or they have bugs, so many times you are not able to follow a trace (without pain/guessing).
This telemetry usually is sent to a remote server, so the attacker could not have deleted it.
Wonder if any anomaly detection would work on that
I’m not aware of any services that a) work like this, or b) would be able to detect this class of attack earlier than last week. If someone does though, please share.
This kind of anomaly detection is possible. Not sure how common it is. I doubt it is common.
An EDR tool would be much better to look for an attacker’s next steps. But if you’re trying to catch a nation state they probably already have a plan for hiding their tracks.