Not saying that the article was being misleading about this, just saying that the LLM part is basically doing some standard interfacing and HTML/CSS/JS around that core engine, which wasn’t immediately obvious to me when scanning the screenshots.
The point here is more about highlighting that browsers can do this stuff, and it doesn't take much to wire it all together into a useful interface.
It matters in this case because for tesseract, the exact model is incredibly important. For example, v4 is pretty bad (but what is available on most linux distros when ran serverside) whereas v5 is decent. So I would have had a more accurate interest in this post if it was a bit more upfront that "Tesseract.js lets you run OCR against PDFs fairly quickly now, largely because of better processors we as devs have, not because of any real software change in the last 2-3 years".
I felt this before for his NLP content too - but clearly it works because he's such a great explainer and one for teasing content later that you do read it! I must say I've never been left confused by Simons work.
What else should I have done?
Was an earlier headline or subtitle here on HN what was misleading, but then that was changed to not be misleading?