Can vouch that this is a nice piece of software, especially the batch convert options (everything from EXIF data, rescaling images and various other transformations, as well as either replacing the original files or various naming options) and supports a bunch of formats.
This comment is baffling. Just so you know, the IrfanView license requires commercial users to pay for a license, just like XnView does. Apparently that's... bad?
I didn't remember what the IrfanView license was/is but IrfanView is not cross-platform which is what I was responding to with an alternative.
How did the comment in any way make it sound bad?
"If it's for non-commercial use."
That’s a neutral fact, not a negative spin.
also allowed in commercial settings (BSD style license):